The Bad Faith Blawg

A Law Blog about Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact Us

Chartis Acts in Bad Faith in Refusing to Defend — Chartis v. Queen Anne HS (W.D. Wash., April 4, 2012)

On April 10, 2012, in Ambiguity, Bad Faith, Covenant Judgments, Duty to Defend, Judge Jones, by Neal Philip
0 Comments
Leave A Response

Washington Supreme Court: Farmers Insurance Co., in Class Action Lawsuit, Must Pay for Diminished Value of Car Involved in Accident, in Addition to Repair Costs — Moeller v. Farmers, 173 Wn.2d 264, December 22, 2011

On December 22, 2011, in Ambiguity, First Party Insurance, Justice Stephens, by Neal Philip
0 Comments
Leave A Response

Ninth Circuit Hears Argument in Lacey Filosa v. Scottsdale Insurance Company (May 5, 2011)

On May 8, 2011, in Ambiguity, Bad Faith, Covenant Judgments, Duty to Defend, Insurance Fair Conduct Act ("IFCA"), Judge Callahan, Judge McKeown, Judge Schroeder, Reasonableness Hearings, by Neal Philip
0 Comments
Leave A Response

Bat Guano Is Not Pollution: Hirschorn v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. (Wis. App.; October 19, 2010)

On October 28, 2010, in Ambiguity, by Neal Philip
0 Comments
Leave A Response

Washington Supreme Courts says insured gets benefit of the doubt on sales tax issue: Holden v. Farmers Insurance Co.

On September 10, 2010, in Ambiguity, by Neal Philip
0 Comments
Leave A Response

Recent Posts 

  • The Attorney-Client Privilege in First Party Bad Faith Cases: Cedell v. Farmers Insurance Company of Washington (Wash. Sup. Ct., 2/21/13)
  • Washington Supreme Court to Farmers Insurance: Covenant Judgment and Reasonableness Hearing Process is Constitutional and Not Subject to Jury Trial — Bird v. Best Plumbing.
  • Chartis Acts in Bad Faith in Refusing to Defend — Chartis v. Queen Anne HS (W.D. Wash., April 4, 2012)
  • House Struck by Water-Propelled Logs — “Weather Conditions” Exclusion Inapplicable: Johnson v. Allstate (W.D. Wash. January 10, 2012)
  • Washington Supreme Court: Farmers Insurance Co., in Class Action Lawsuit, Must Pay for Diminished Value of Car Involved in Accident, in Addition to Repair Costs — Moeller v. Farmers, 173 Wn.2d 264, December 22, 2011
 

Categories 

  • Ambiguity
  • Attorney-Client Privilege
  • Bad Faith
  • Class Actions
  • Consumer Protection Act ("CPA")
  • Covenant Judgments
  • Defense Costs
  • Duty to Defend
  • Duty to Settle
  • Efficient Proximate Cause
  • Estoppel
  • First Party Insurance
  • Insurance Coverage Primer
  • Insurance Fair Conduct Act ("IFCA")
  • Judge Appelwick
  • Judge Callahan
  • Judge Cox
  • Judge Ellington
  • Judge Grosse
  • Judge Jones
  • Judge Lasnik
  • Judge Martinez
  • Judge McKeown
  • Judge Robart
  • Judge Schindler
  • Judge Schroeder
  • Judge Spearman
  • Judge Zilly
  • Justice Fairhurst
  • Justice Stephens
  • Motions in Limine
  • Pre-tender Defense Costs
  • Reasonableness Hearings
  • Reimbursement of Defense Costs
  • Retroactivity of IFCA
 

Blogroll 

  • Fulton & Philip Website
  • Insurance Coverage Law Blog
  • Lawyers Helping Hungry Children
  • Northwest Insurance Law Blog
  • Ontario Insurance Law Blog
  • Washington Insurance Law Blog
 

Archive 

  • February 2013
  • October 2012
  • April 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
 
Go To Top »

The Bad Faith Blawg

Pages

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact Us

Stay In Touch

  • Site RSS Feed

More

Thanks for dropping by! Feel free to join the discussion by leaving comments, and stay updated by subscribing to the RSS feed.
© 2010 The Bad Faith Blawg
WhiteHouse by PageLines